Specialists in the Medical & Psychological Aspects of Transgender Health Care 

Carl W. Bushong, Ph.D., LMFT
Richard A. Martin, Jr., M.D., FACEP
Kimberly L. Westwood, CPE, CCE
et al.
  electrolysis guide  
Transgender Care Health Information Archive 
 

  Topics & Issues

  Click item to view:
 
 About
 TransGenderCare 
• Our Web Site: TransGenderCare
• Our Staff
• Our History
• Accuracy & Ethics Policy
• Contact TransGenderCare
• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Use
home > Electrolysis Guide > Treatment Methods

 TREATMENT METHODS  TOPICS  
• Temporary Methods : The variety of methods to temporarily remove unwanted hair.
• Unproven Methods : The methods professed to be permanent, but are temporary.
• Electrolysis Methods : An overview of the methods of needle-based electrolysis.
• Laser Study : Study of hair regrowth using Nd:YAG laser method.
• Electrolysis Epilator : The electronic device used in needle electrolysis.
   CLICK ON AN ITEM, ABOVE, TO GO TO THAT TOPIC 

Nd:YAG Laser Method
Study of Hair Regrowth following Treatment

Laser technology has been used within the field of medicine for close to 40 years. Modern-day lasers can effectively and safely treat a variety of cutaneous conditions, including vascular and pigmented lesions, scars, wrinkles and tattoos. The frontier of cutaneous laser medicine has expanded with the recent introduction of laser-assisted hair removal techniques. Laser-assisted hair removal is appealing because it offers a rapid, relatively painless method for hair removal with minimal risk of scarring or other adverse effects?   Several lasers are currently under investigation for hair removal including the Q-switched neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet [Nd:YAG], long-pulsed ruby, and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers.


Figure 1. Mean percentage of patient hair regrowth.

In 1996, the Food and Drug Administration approved a patented laser process (SoftLight, Thermolase Corp., LaJolla, Calif.) for hair removal that includes the use of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser after pretreatment wax epilation and application of a carbon-based solution. The present study examines Q- switched Nd:YAG laser- assisted hair removal and attempts to determine whether the above-described patented procedure is necessary for optimal laser hair removal. The medical literature lacks any evidence that the combination of wax epilation and carbon solution application followed by Q-switched Nd:YAG laser irradiation is more effective than wax epilation alone. It is also unclear whether the time-consuming and messy procedure of waxing and carbon solution application is more efficacious than laser irradiation alone when used on hair-bearing skin. Therefore, the present study served to evaluate hair growth within three laser-treated sites with differing pretreatment protocols using a fourth wax-epilated site as a control.

RESULTS:

Hair regrowth was evaluated by hair counts and subjective patient evaluations of hair density at each of the three follow-up visits (at 1, 3 and 6 months]. The mean percentage of regrowth (Figure 1] at 1 month was 39.9% [P<.001] for the wax-carbon- laser quadrants, 46.7% [P<.001] for the wax-laser quadrants, 66.1% [P=.01] for the laser-alone quadrants, and 77.9% for the wax control quadrants (Figure 2 and Figure 3]. At the 3-month follow-up, all laser-treated quadrants had significantly less hair regrowth than the control quadrant, with a mean of 79.1% [P=.006] for the wax-carbon-laser quadrants, 85.2% [P=.01] for the wax-laser quadrants, 86.3% [P=.02] for the laser-alone quadrants, and 102.2% for the wax control quadrants (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Each percentage of regrowth was well approximated by a normal distribution. All hypothesis tests and associated P-values are two-sided.

 


Figure 6. Patient Hair Density.

 

Patient subjective hair-density estimates reflected the objective hair count data (Figure 6). Full hair regrowth occurred in all study quadrants based on hair counts and patient hair-density estimates by the 6-month follow-up evaluation. Several patients, however, reported that their hair quality had changed after laser treatment, the regrown hairs exhibiting finer texture and lighter color.This change in hair quality could not be easily judged by photographic analysis and therefore could not be supported by objective data. Other than a transient folliculitis that developed in three wax-epilated test quadrants, no cutaneous pigmentary or textural complications developed after laser treatment.

 

COMMENT:

Hair removal has become a major research interest and economic force within the field of cutaneous laser medicine. Laser systems with differing wavelengths, pulse durations and energy densities are currently under development for hair removal, based largely on unproven theories and vague mechanisms of action. While the theory of selective photothermolysis could be used to optimize wavelengths and pulse durations for laser epilation, the exact target within the hair follicle has yet to be clearly established? The hair matrix, papilla, and bulge are all potential areas of hair follicle vulnerability. However, without knowledge of a specific follicular target, it becomes difficult to predict which laser wavelengths and pulse durations will be most successful.

At the time of study initiation, only one laser-assisted hair removal device had been approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration [the SoftLight system by Thermolase Corp.]. This system uses energy from a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser following pretreatment wax epilation and application of a patented carbon-based topical solution. It provides an exogenous target chromophore [eg, carbon] to which 1064- nm-wavelength laser light has an affinity. The carbon is theoretically placed within wax-epilated follicles, and laser- induced thermal and photoacoustic damage is subsequently produced within the follicular structure. Selective damage, then, remains independent of the presence of endogenous melanin.

The results of this study suggest that after a single Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment, a change within the hair follicle is produced that results in a delay of hair regrowth. However, permanent hair removal [cessation of hair growth in treatment areas for the lifetime of the patient] was not achieved. All treatment sites exhibited full hair regrowth by six months, with some patients demonstrating regrowth as early as one and three months. While the ideal goal of laser- assisted epilation is permanence, the results of this study are consistent with those of previous studies involving single- session laser hair removal. Goldberg” reported that Q- switched Nd:YAG laser treatment and application of carbon solution provided a reduction in hair growth for up to six months. Grossman et al reported a delay in hair growth for a six-month period after long-pulsed normal-mode ruby laser irradiation. This apparent lack of permanence after laser hair removal has been disappointing, but not entirely unexpected, considering the vulnerability of hair to treatment at different phases in its growth cycle.

Repeated laser injury to the hair follicle, which was not examined in the current study, should be investigated. Future studies should also address the question of whether laser light simply induces a prolonged telogen hair cycle or whether irreversible follicular damage is possible. Ultimately, histologic examination of treated hirsute sites will be necessary to fully understand the mechanisms of laser-assisted hair removal.

Although pretreatment with wax epilation and a topical carbon solution resulted in significant hair removal, this protocol was not essential. All laser-treated sites showed less hair regrowth at three months than the wax-epilated control quadrants, suggesting that the laser energy can target the follicle without an exogenous carbon chromophore. However, because of the limited number of anatomic regions treated in this study, we lacked the statistical power to determine if a particular pretreatment protocol was superior to another.

It is interesting to note that the quadrants that were simply exposed to laser radiation without waxing or carbon solution did not show a significant reduction in hair growth until the third month. This finding may be attributed to the fact that, in areas that were not wax epilated, laser irradiation caused the terminal hairs to whiten but to remain in the follicles. Although the hair shafts were injured, hair counts at one month included these depigmented hair shafts. By the third month, however, the injured hairs had fallen out of the follicles and a significant reduction in hair counts was recorded.

While the results of this study suggest that wax epilation and/or carbon-based solution application is not essential to the laser-assisted hair-removal process, it is important to note that all study subjects had brown or black hair. When blonde or white hair-bearing areas are being treated, exogenous carbon pigment application may play a more important role in selectively targeting and concentrating laser energy into the follicle. Presumably, melanocytes and melanin within the hair follicle and shaft are the primary targets of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser energy when the laser treatment is used without a carbon solution.

These melanin-producing cells are located within the hair matrix at the base of the follicle, the infundibulum, and sparsely within the outer root sheath.(8,9) As there are greater numbers of melanocytes within the hair follicle than there are within the epidermis, laser energy can pass through the skin surface and be absorbed selectively by follicular melanin.(9) This selective process obviously becomes more problematic when lighter hair colors are being treated. Gray hair, for instance, has fewer melanocytes at the hair bulb, and blonde hair has a decreased number of partially pigmented melanosomes as compared with black hair.* Therefore, exogenous pigment in the form of a carbon-based solution may be helpful in the treatment of individuals with lighter hair colors.

In conclusion, a single treatment with a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser results in a greater delay of hair growth (up to six months) when compared with wax epilation alone. Regardless of the use of pretreatment wax epilation or carbon topical solution, hair growth was decreased when compared with control [waxed] areas. Complete hair regrowth occurred by six months after a single treatment, suggesting that further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment intervals, energy settings, wavelengths, and pulse durations needed to achieve longer-lasting or permanent laser-assisted hair removal.

Subjects and Methods:

Twelve subjects (3 men and 9 women; mean age, 32 years) were enrolled in the study. A total of 18 anatomic locations were evaluated, including 6 backs, 3 upper lips, 1 chin and 8 legs. Potential subjects with evidence of endocrine dysfunction, immune suppression, recent oral retinoid use, drug-induced hypertrichosis, sensitivity to infrared light, photosensitivity, collagen vascular disease, or androgen-producing tumor were excluded. Skin type, sex, hair-removal history and patient age were recorded. All skin types were considered for inclusion, although only skin types I and IV were represented. Only subjects with black or brown terminal hair were included. A Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (Thermolase Corp.) was used at a fluence of 2.6 J/cm*, a wavelength of 1064nm, a pulse duration of 50 nanoseconds, a 7-mm spot size, and a pulse repetition rate of 10 Hz. Study areas on the back and legs were divided into 3-cm* quadrants using a standard template. Facial areas were divided into 1 -cm* quadrants using a smaller template. Treatment sites were placed in a linear fashion, with orientation and location randomized for each anatomic area. Pretreatment protocol in 1 quadrant consisted of wax epilation and carbon-based solution application (Thermolase Corp.) with subsequent laser irradiation using the above set parameters. A second quadrant was wax epilated (without carbon solution) and exposed to laser radiation. A third area was exposed to laser radiation without any pretreatment waxing or carbon solution application. The last quadrant was simply wax epilated and served as a control. Those sites pretreated with carbon solution retained a thin film of surface carbon after gentle wiping of excess solution with dry gauze. The pretreated skin was subsequently irradiated within 15 minutes after the application of carbon solution. Evaluations at 1,3 and 6 months after treatment consisted of consecutive photographic documentation using identical lighting, camera and patient positioning (Mirror Image System, Virtual Eyes Inc., Kirkland, Wash.); manual hair counts; and subjective patient hair- density estimates. Hair-density estimates were based on each patient’s subjective evaluation using a scale of no hair growth, minimal or moderate growth, and thick hair growth as options. The number of terminal hairs present after treatment were compared with baseline hair counts. The percentage of hair regrowth was defined as the percentage of hairs that were present after treatment compared with baseline hair counts. Anatomic locations were grouped and analyzed separately. The percentage of hair regrowth was calculated for each study quadrant. Paired-difference t tests were used to compare treatments. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests of the paired differences were also performed for confirmation. Hochberg improved Bonferroni procedure was used to maintain a joint significance level of .05 for the four tests within a single time point.

REFERENCES:

Goldberg DJ. Topical solution-assisted laser hair removal. Lasers Surg Med. 1995; suppl 7:47. Abstract.
Goldberg DJ. Topical suspension assisted laser hair removal; treatment of axillary and inguinal regions. Laser Surg Med. 1996; suppl 8:195.Abstract.
Grossman MC, Dierickx C, Farinelli W, et al. Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996; 35:889-894.
Grossman MC, Wimberly J, Dwyer P, et al. PDT for hirsutism. Lasers Surg Med. 1995; suppl 7:47. Abstract.
Alster TS. Manual of Cutaneous Laser Techniques. Philadelphia, Pa; Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:128-134.
Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis; precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;220:524-527.
Richards RN, Meharg GE. Electrolysis: observations from 13 years and 140,000 hours of experience. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995; 33:662-668.
McKee PH. Pathology of the Skin. London, England: Mosby-Wolfe; 1996:1.20-1.21.
Olsen EA. Disorders of Hair Growth. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1994:52-55.


Information provided and accessed through TransGenderCare.com is presented in a summary form and should not be used as a substitute for a consultation or visit with a physician, psychologist, electrologist or other health care provider. (See Terms & Conditions.) 

Site Help
Privacy Policy
Comments & Feedback

This Site may also be accessed via www.tgcare.com

Transgender Care Health Information Archive
Copyright © 1994-2007 TransGenderCare. All rights reserved.
Interested in linking to TransGenderCare?