|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
Temporary Methods :
The variety of methods to temporarily remove unwanted hair. |
| |
Unproven Methods :
The methods professed to be permanent, but are temporary. |
| |
Electrolysis Methods
: An overview of the methods of needle-based electrolysis. |
| |
Laser Study : Study of
hair regrowth using Nd:YAG laser method. |
| |
Electrolysis Epilator
: The electronic device used in needle electrolysis. |
| |
CLICK ON AN ITEM,
ABOVE, TO GO TO THAT TOPIC
|
|
Nd:YAG
Laser Method
Study of Hair Regrowth following Treatment
Laser technology has been used within the field of medicine for
close to 40 years. Modern-day lasers can effectively and safely treat a
variety of cutaneous conditions, including vascular and pigmented
lesions, scars, wrinkles and tattoos. The frontier of cutaneous laser
medicine has expanded with the recent introduction of laser-assisted
hair removal techniques. Laser-assisted hair removal is appealing
because it offers a rapid, relatively painless method for hair removal
with minimal risk of scarring or other adverse effects?
Several lasers are currently under investigation for hair removal
including the Q-switched neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet [Nd:YAG],
long-pulsed ruby, and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers.
|

Figure 1. Mean percentage of patient hair regrowth.
|
In 1996, the Food and Drug Administration approved a patented
laser process (SoftLight, Thermolase Corp., LaJolla, Calif.) for hair
removal that includes the use of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser after
pretreatment wax epilation and application of a carbon-based solution.
The present study examines Q- switched Nd:YAG laser- assisted hair
removal and attempts to determine whether the above-described patented
procedure is necessary for optimal laser hair removal. The medical
literature lacks any evidence that the combination of wax epilation and
carbon solution application followed by Q-switched Nd:YAG laser
irradiation is more effective than wax epilation alone. It is also
unclear whether the time-consuming and messy procedure of waxing and
carbon solution application is more efficacious than laser irradiation
alone when used on hair-bearing skin. Therefore, the present study
served to evaluate hair growth within three laser-treated sites with
differing pretreatment protocols using a fourth wax-epilated site as a
control.
RESULTS:
Hair
regrowth was evaluated by hair counts and subjective patient evaluations
of hair density at each of the three follow-up visits (at 1, 3 and 6
months]. The mean percentage of regrowth (Figure 1] at 1 month was 39.9%
[P<.001] for the wax-carbon- laser quadrants, 46.7% [P<.001] for
the wax-laser quadrants, 66.1% [P=.01] for the laser-alone quadrants,
and 77.9% for the wax control quadrants (Figure 2 and Figure 3]. At the
3-month follow-up, all laser-treated quadrants had significantly less
hair regrowth than the control quadrant, with a mean of 79.1% [P=.006]
for the wax-carbon-laser quadrants, 85.2% [P=.01] for the wax-laser
quadrants, 86.3% [P=.02] for the laser-alone quadrants, and 102.2% for
the wax control quadrants (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Each percentage of
regrowth was well approximated by a normal distribution. All hypothesis
tests and associated P-values are two-sided. |

Figure 6. Patient
Hair Density.
|
|
Patient subjective
hair-density estimates reflected the objective hair count data (Figure
6). Full hair regrowth occurred in all study quadrants based on hair
counts and patient hair-density estimates by the 6-month follow-up
evaluation. Several patients, however, reported that their hair quality
had changed after laser treatment, the regrown hairs exhibiting finer
texture and lighter color.This change in hair quality could not be
easily judged by photographic analysis and therefore could not be
supported by objective data. Other than a transient folliculitis that
developed in three wax-epilated test quadrants, no cutaneous pigmentary
or textural complications developed after laser treatment.
|
COMMENT:
Hair removal has become a major research interest and economic
force within the field of cutaneous laser medicine. Laser systems with
differing wavelengths, pulse durations and energy densities are
currently under development for hair removal, based largely on unproven
theories and vague mechanisms of action. While the theory of selective
photothermolysis could be used to optimize wavelengths and pulse
durations for laser epilation, the exact target within the hair follicle
has yet to be clearly established? The hair matrix, papilla, and bulge
are all potential areas of hair follicle vulnerability. However, without
knowledge of a specific follicular target, it becomes difficult to
predict which laser wavelengths and pulse durations will be most
successful.
At the time of study initiation, only one laser-assisted hair
removal device had been approved for use by the Food and Drug
Administration [the SoftLight system by Thermolase Corp.]. This system
uses energy from a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser following pretreatment wax
epilation and application of a patented carbon-based topical solution.
It provides an exogenous target chromophore [eg, carbon] to which 1064-
nm-wavelength laser light has an affinity. The carbon is theoretically
placed within wax-epilated follicles, and laser- induced thermal and
photoacoustic damage is subsequently produced within the follicular
structure. Selective damage, then, remains independent of the presence
of endogenous melanin.
The results of this study suggest that after a single
Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment, a change within the hair follicle is
produced that results in a delay of hair regrowth. However,
permanent hair removal [cessation of hair growth in treatment areas for
the lifetime of the patient] was not achieved. All
treatment sites exhibited full hair regrowth by six months, with some
patients demonstrating regrowth as early as one and three months. While
the ideal goal of laser- assisted epilation is permanence, the results
of this study are consistent with those of previous studies involving
single- session laser hair removal. Goldberg reported that Q-
switched Nd:YAG laser treatment and application of carbon solution
provided a reduction in hair growth for up to six months. Grossman et al
reported a delay in hair growth for a six-month period after long-pulsed
normal-mode ruby laser irradiation. This apparent lack of permanence
after laser hair removal has been disappointing, but not entirely
unexpected, considering the vulnerability of hair to treatment at
different phases in its growth cycle.
Repeated laser injury to the hair follicle, which was not
examined in the current study, should be investigated. Future studies
should also address the question of whether laser light simply induces a
prolonged telogen hair cycle or whether irreversible follicular damage
is possible. Ultimately, histologic examination of treated hirsute sites
will be necessary to fully understand the mechanisms of laser-assisted
hair removal.
Although pretreatment with wax epilation and a topical carbon
solution resulted in significant hair removal, this protocol was not
essential. All laser-treated sites showed less hair regrowth at three
months than the wax-epilated control quadrants, suggesting that the
laser energy can target the follicle without an exogenous carbon
chromophore. However, because of the limited number of anatomic regions
treated in this study, we lacked the statistical power to determine if a
particular pretreatment protocol was superior to another.
It is interesting to note that the quadrants that were simply
exposed to laser radiation without waxing or carbon solution did not
show a significant reduction in hair growth until the third month. This
finding may be attributed to the fact that, in areas that were not wax
epilated, laser irradiation caused the terminal hairs to whiten but to
remain in the follicles. Although the hair shafts were injured, hair
counts at one month included these depigmented hair shafts. By the third
month, however, the injured hairs had fallen out of the follicles and a
significant reduction in hair counts was recorded.
While the results of this study suggest that wax epilation
and/or carbon-based solution application is not essential to the
laser-assisted hair-removal process, it is important to note that all
study subjects had brown or black hair. When blonde or white
hair-bearing areas are being treated, exogenous carbon pigment
application may play a more important role in selectively targeting and
concentrating laser energy into the follicle. Presumably, melanocytes
and melanin within the hair follicle and shaft are the primary targets
of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser energy when the laser treatment is used
without a carbon solution.
These melanin-producing cells are located within the hair
matrix at the base of the follicle, the infundibulum, and sparsely
within the outer root sheath.(8,9) As there are greater numbers of
melanocytes within the hair follicle than there are within the
epidermis, laser energy can pass through the skin surface and be
absorbed selectively by follicular melanin.(9) This selective process
obviously becomes more problematic when lighter hair colors are being
treated. Gray hair, for instance, has fewer melanocytes at the hair
bulb, and blonde hair has a decreased number of partially pigmented
melanosomes as compared with black hair.* Therefore, exogenous pigment
in the form of a carbon-based solution may be helpful in the treatment
of individuals with lighter hair colors.
In conclusion, a single treatment with a Q-switched Nd:YAG
laser results in a greater delay of hair growth (up to six months) when
compared with wax epilation alone. Regardless of the use of pretreatment
wax epilation or carbon topical solution, hair growth was decreased when
compared with control [waxed] areas. Complete hair regrowth occurred by
six months after a single treatment, suggesting that further research is
needed to determine the optimal treatment intervals, energy settings,
wavelengths, and pulse durations needed to achieve longer-lasting or
permanent laser-assisted hair removal.

| Subjects
and Methods:
Twelve subjects (3 men and 9 women; mean age, 32 years) were
enrolled in the study. A total of 18 anatomic locations were evaluated,
including 6 backs, 3 upper lips, 1 chin and 8 legs. Potential subjects
with evidence of endocrine dysfunction, immune suppression, recent oral
retinoid use, drug-induced hypertrichosis, sensitivity to infrared
light, photosensitivity, collagen vascular disease, or
androgen-producing tumor were excluded. Skin type, sex, hair-removal
history and patient age were recorded. All skin types were considered
for inclusion, although only skin types I and IV were represented. Only
subjects with black or brown terminal hair were included. A Q-switched
Nd:YAG laser (Thermolase Corp.) was used at a fluence of 2.6 J/cm*, a
wavelength of 1064nm, a pulse duration of 50 nanoseconds, a 7-mm spot
size, and a pulse repetition rate of 10 Hz. Study areas on the back and
legs were divided into 3-cm* quadrants using a standard template. Facial
areas were divided into 1 -cm* quadrants using a smaller template.
Treatment sites were placed in a linear fashion, with orientation and
location randomized for each anatomic area. Pretreatment protocol in 1
quadrant consisted of wax epilation and carbon-based solution
application (Thermolase Corp.) with subsequent laser irradiation using
the above set parameters. A second quadrant was wax epilated (without
carbon solution) and exposed to laser radiation. A third area was
exposed to laser radiation without any pretreatment waxing or carbon
solution application. The last quadrant was simply wax epilated and
served as a control. Those sites pretreated with carbon solution
retained a thin film of surface carbon after gentle wiping of excess
solution with dry gauze. The pretreated skin was subsequently irradiated
within 15 minutes after the application of carbon solution. Evaluations
at 1,3 and 6 months after treatment consisted of consecutive
photographic documentation using identical lighting, camera and patient
positioning (Mirror Image System, Virtual Eyes Inc., Kirkland, Wash.);
manual hair counts; and subjective patient hair- density estimates.
Hair-density estimates were based on each patients subjective
evaluation using a scale of no hair growth, minimal or moderate growth,
and thick hair growth as options. The number of terminal hairs present
after treatment were compared with baseline hair counts. The percentage
of hair regrowth was defined as the percentage of hairs that were
present after treatment compared with baseline hair counts. Anatomic
locations were grouped and analyzed separately. The percentage of hair
regrowth was calculated for each study quadrant. Paired-difference t
tests were used to compare treatments. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests of the
paired differences were also performed for confirmation. Hochberg
improved Bonferroni procedure was used to maintain a joint significance
level of .05 for the four tests within a single time point. |
|
|
|
REFERENCES:
Goldberg DJ. Topical solution-assisted laser hair removal.
Lasers Surg Med. 1995; suppl 7:47. Abstract.
Goldberg DJ. Topical suspension assisted laser hair removal; treatment
of axillary and inguinal regions. Laser Surg Med. 1996; suppl
8:195.Abstract.
Grossman MC, Dierickx C, Farinelli W, et al. Damage to hair follicles by
normal-mode ruby pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996; 35:889-894.
Grossman MC, Wimberly J, Dwyer P, et al. PDT for hirsutism. Lasers Surg
Med. 1995; suppl 7:47. Abstract.
Alster TS. Manual of Cutaneous Laser Techniques. Philadelphia, Pa;
Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:128-134.
Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis; precise
microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science.
1983;220:524-527.
Richards RN, Meharg GE. Electrolysis: observations from 13 years and
140,000 hours of experience. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995; 33:662-668.
McKee PH. Pathology of the Skin. London, England: Mosby-Wolfe;
1996:1.20-1.21.
Olsen EA. Disorders of Hair Growth. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.;
1994:52-55.

|